Gotham Notes...

Thursday, October 02, 2008


VP Debate I: Dog Whistles


The Desperate Right's Meme Machine is in full working order.

Their last hope at this juncture is to turn tonight's vice presidential debate with Sen. Joe Biden into The Special Olympics; to set the bar soooooo low, that Sarah Palin shows true grit and courage merely by showing up—and, by simply avoiding soiling her clothes at all, she's WINS!

That's their main talking point.

What we all need to listen for is that high-pitched tone of bullshit as Rupert Murdoch et al. slip the FOX-based story line into his new Dow Jones properties, and therefore into CNN and the AP and the rest of the MSM coverage.

Here's how it goes:
First, hide in plain sight. Make a ludicrous claim in your lede. Soften/bury your side's nightmare, then set up and keep the focus on a non-existent bar that's immaterial to the event for the other side to hurdle—that your opponent couldn't overcome even if it WERE material.
What's clear is that while Republican Palin will seek to bounce back from some recent public gaffes, Democrat Biden is expected to dance around the PR landmines that could make him appear too condescending if he pounces too hard on his opponent.

Perfect. Re-establish "The Right as Victim" idea. Big Bad Joe snarling at Poor Little Plucky Sunshine-y Sarah. So Biden loses by even showing up, or by not sufficiently bowing and scraping to the Republican candidate for vice president (the part Dick Cheney has always enjoyed about the job). Meanwhile, Palin would be free to carve out the entrails of her opponent without being pushed on any relevent topic, as she successfully did in the 2006 Alaska governor's debates by throwing non-existant bullshit on the table, then sitting back and smiling a lot while her opponents sputtered.

Sorry, Rupert, the job of both of these candidates tonight is to rip each other's face off, and to rip the face off of the head of the opposite ticket.

That's the job. Take it or go home.

Palin is no shy flower. This is a serial killer with the nice-lady-next-door smile. We fall for this routine at our peril.

Next, listen/watch for this propaganda approach:
List the correctly stated derision aimed at Palin recently, then use blind (i.e., non-existent) sources to make your right-wing case for you, while you pretend to simply be "reporting." To whit:
And Palin has become the butt of late-night jokes, most notably an uncanny impersonation of her by actress Tina Fey on "Saturday Night Live." One recent episode satirized her interview with [Katie] Couric.

Could help?

Oddly enough, pundits on both sides say that kind of sentiment now could actually work in Palin's favor. The bar has been placed so low on expectations for Palin that all she has to do now is simply avoid further missteps and stay within her game.

Most of all, she needs to let viewers see the side of her that charmed the party faithful and others at the Republican National Convention—a populist candidate who relates to middle America through her vernacular and personal experiences.

OK, let's walk through this again—

Who is the pundit who said this, and for which McCain Campaign does he/she work? Name names or get this crap off my page or TV screen. This needs to be jumped on as BULLSHIT, EVERY time it's stated.
The bar has been placed so low on expectations for Palin

The only ones placing the bar low on Palin are in the Palin/McCain campaign, which translates as, "Please, please, don't hurt our candidate! We beg of you!"

Then, you can slide in THE TOTAL REFRAMING of the discussion:
Most of all, she needs to let viewers see the side of her that charmed the party faithful and others at the Republican National Convention—a populist candidate who relates to middle America through her vernacular and personal experiences.

As opposed to any particular knowledge, education, awareness, ability, or general fitness that any man or woman would need for the job of President of the United States of America (we're still betting that McCain wouldn't see the mid-term elections).

Here's where to keep the entire focus:

So, you don't like George W. Bush?

John McCain IS LIKE George W. Bush.

Sarah Palin IS George W. Bush.

posted by Gotham 11:25 AM
0 comments

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

 

Gotham Notes...
This being an ongoing stream of thoughts on issues that affect us all, from the fairest city in the land: New York, NY.

All content © 2009 Gotham Notes.

NEW!
Send e-mail to Gotham Notes...

Photobucket

Subscribe to our Site Feed

 Subscribe in a reader

Subscribe to Gotham Notes... by e-mail!
Enter your e-mail address:

Delivered by FeedBurner

The Big Apple

NYC Nightlife / Live Music

Political Reports

The First Amendment Center
Air America Radio
**The Randi Rhodes Show
The Progress Report
MSNBC's First Read
BuzzFlash
Tom Paine's Common Sense

Blogs of Note

13
Crooks And Liars
AMERICAblog
Raw Story
Huffington Post
Talking Points Memo
TPM Muckraker
TPM Election Central
Altercations
Political Animal / Kevin Drum
Joe Conason / Salon
Joe Conason / N.Y. Observer
Paul Krugman
The Writings of Greg Palast
Juan Cole / Informed Comment
Daily Kos
Eschaton
Firedoglake
Digby / Hullabaloo
David Sirota
MyDD
Swing State Project
Brad DeLong's Semi-Daily Journal
Countdown
I Blame The Patriarchy

gotham

On the Other Hand...

Andrew Sullivan's Daily Dish
OpinionJournal / The Wall Street Journal
The Corner / National Review
Matt Drudge
Instapundit

Groups, Organizations

MoveOn.org
TrueMajority

News Outlets

Dailies:
The New York Times
Newsday
New York Daily News
New York Post
The New York Sun

Weeklies:
The Village Voice
New York Observer
New York Press

National:
The Hill
The Christian Science Monitor
USA TODAY

TV / Radio:
NY1 (cable news)
WCBS Channel 2
WNBC Channel 4
WABC Channel 7
WINS 1010 AM radio
(Many more coming soon!)


Here's a calculator to help you get a clearer picture of just how you'd make out under Obama's tax plan, rather than just extending the Bush tax cuts which is all that McCain is proposing.




Stop the heartbreak of catalog glut.
Click here:




Past Is Prologue (GN archives)

April 2003 May 2003 June 2003 July 2003 August 2003 September 2003 October 2003 November 2003 December 2003 January 2004 February 2004 March 2004 April 2004 May 2004 June 2004 July 2004 August 2004 September 2004 October 2004 November 2004 December 2004 January 2005 February 2005 March 2005 June 2005 July 2005 August 2005 September 2005 October 2005 December 2005 January 2006 February 2006 August 2006 December 2006 February 2007 August 2007 October 2007 December 2007 March 2008 April 2008 May 2008 June 2008 August 2008 September 2008 October 2008 November 2008 December 2008 January 2009 February 2009 July 2009 August 2009 September 2009 current